Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!dali.cs.montana.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!nuchat!xcluud!gtolar From: gtolar@xcluud.sccsi.com (Glynne Tolar) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2 Subject: Re: ACCELERATOR - ZIP OR TRANSWARP? Message-ID: Date: 17 May 91 20:34:56 GMT References: <737@generic.UUCP> Organization: Greater Montrose UFO Appreciation Society Lines: 20 ericmcg@pnet91.cts.com (Eric Mcgillicuddy) writes: > I'm sorry, but I don't have access to a Zip chip that slow!! The one I > received is clocked at 8MHz with 16k of cache. I have not yet installed the > 64k of cache, but this will not slow it down, just the opposite I suspect. Th > problem is finding a test that would convince everyone one way or the other. > None of the published benchmarks have convinced me on other machines, so I > don't see it working here. > > UUCP: bkj386!pnet91!ericmcg > INET: ericmcg@pnet91.cts.com I have access to both a 7MHz ZipChip (mine is 9) w/8k cache and a TWGS. If somebody will sugest some tests I'll do them and report. We don't care, we don't have to. We're Apple computer. ----------------------- OR ----------------------------- Apple II forever. I just love hearing the company LInE. Pick your favorite. gtolar@xcluud.sccsi.com I didn't write the organization or path. I just use it.