Path: utzoo!utdoe!generic!pnet91!ericmcg
From: ericmcg@pnet91.cts.com (Eric Mcgillicuddy)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Re: ZipGS vs Transwarp compatibility
Message-ID: <748@generic.UUCP>
Date: 19 May 91 15:45:02 GMT
Sender: root@generic.UUCP
Organization: People-Net [pnet91], Etobicoke, ON
Lines: 14

>What do you mean it does not work well with ProTerm 2.2?  I don't own a
>ZipGS, but have used one with ProTerm and not had any problems.(?)
>
>Jeff Tarr, Jr.
>Sysop:  AppleSauce BBS - 212/721-4122  Apple II and Macintosh Support.

The Zip must be slowed down for transfers, I find 50% is good enough, but full
speed will drop you into the monitor. I as having other problems, mainly with
saving captured text to disk (binscii's et al), but this has "gotten better"
with usage, I don't know why. I assume 3.0 will fix this, but I have not hear
d anything about it.

UUCP: bkj386!pnet91!ericmcg
INET: ericmcg@pnet91.cts.com