Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!apple!mattd
From: mattd@Apple.COM (Matt Deatherage)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Re: ProTERM info needed
Message-ID: <53096@apple.Apple.COM>
Date: 20 May 91 04:55:51 GMT
References: <1991May19.211412.8118@clark.edu>
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA
Lines: 25

In article <1991May19.211412.8118@clark.edu> matthew@pro-nka.cts.com (Matthew McGehrin) writes:
>In-Reply-To: message from PKBRANDON@MSUS1.MSUS.EDU
>
>> "I got a copy of 2.2 from a friend..."
>> Sounds like --matthew didn't pay for his 25 cents worth!
>>
>And good thing that I did. 2.2 would be a waste of money.

This is really unjustified.  I use ProTERM 2.2 on a daily basis for all kinds
of telecommunications needs, from Usenet to GEnie to various BBSs.  It works
with AppleTalk (not fully, but well enough), handles all my file transfer
needs, and does so well and efficiently.  It's tons better than 2.1 in my
opinion, and I like to think my opinion is not a waste.

The only depressing part of this discussion is all the people who say they
don't need a GS/OS version because all they ever use is P8 anyway.  And
people wonder why GS-specific software doesn't get written.
 
-- 
============================================================================
Matt Deatherage, Developer Technical  | The opinions expressed herein are
Support, Apple Computer, Inc.         | not those of Apple Computer, and
Personal mail only, please.  Thanks.  | shame on you for thinking otherwise.
^^^^^^^^ Technical questions are not personal. Please post them instead.
============================================================================