Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!apple!equinox!jimi!arrakis!alfter
From: alfter@nevada.edu (SCOTT ALFTER)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Re: ZipGS vs Transwarp compatibility
Message-ID: <1991May20.061020.10420@nevada.edu>
Date: 20 May 91 06:10:20 GMT
References: <748@generic.UUCP>
Sender: news@nevada.edu (News Administrator)
Organization: University of Nevada, System Computing Services
Lines: 17

In article <748@generic.UUCP> ericmcg@pnet91.cts.com (Eric Mcgillicuddy) writes:
>[someone else writes:]
>>What do you mean it does not work well with ProTerm 2.2?  I don't own a
>>ZipGS, but have used one with ProTerm and not had any problems.(?)
>The Zip must be slowed down for transfers, I find 50% is good enough, but full
>speed will drop you into the monitor.

Sounds strange.  Going off the subject of GS accelerators a little
bit, I run the RocketChip in my IIe at full speed and have no problems
with ProTERM.  (However, you do run into timing trouble with the
AppleNet BBS package; a few POKEs in ANET.FILES and ANET.UTILITIES
will slow down the accelerator only during transfers.)

Scott Alfter-----------------------------_/_----------------------------
Ask me about SoftDAC!  Play Mac sounds  / v \ on your Apple II!
Internet: alfter@uns-helios.nevada.edu (    ( Apple II:
   GEnie: S.ALFTER                      \_^_/ the power to be your best!