Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!ucbvax!SNYBUFVA.BITNET!WAXMONRW
From: WAXMONRW@SNYBUFVA.BITNET
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Re: Re^2: Term Progs
Message-ID: <0F04C55620203296@SNYBUFVA>
Date: 21 May 91 21:12:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: SNYBUFVA.0F04C55620203296
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 23

John Grohol said:

>Having only ever an Apple IIgs, I can't imagine why anybody would
>actually LIKE Appleworks 3.0. I have seen this program and it reminds
>me of the stone ages in word processing. I know it's as good as
>most IBM word processors, but if ya got a GS (which excels in graphics
>and sound), you should, as a matter of opinion, use graphically-
>oriented software. I use Wordperfect for the GS and love it! It's
>the easiest, powerful word processor I have seen in a while...

>IMHO.

I know better than this but I cannot resist! I have not used WordPerfect
for the GS but I do use WordPerfect 5.1 (the current msdos version). It
is a powerful wordprocessor but I have never heard it described as
"the easiest, powerful word process I have seen in a while", unless
of course, you have not seen many wordprocessors! It has been my
experience that "WordPerfect" and "ease of use" are a contradiction
in terms!

MHO!

Ray Waxmonsky (waxmonrw@snybufva)