Newsgroups: comp.sys.handhelds Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!casbah.acns.nwu.edu!nucsrl!kaufman From: kaufman@eecs.nwu.edu (Michael L. Kaufman) Subject: Re: RFD comp.sys.handelds split Message-ID: <1991May22.032223.27895@eecs.nwu.edu> Organization: EECS Department, Northwestern University References: <7601@rex.cs.tulane.edu> Date: Wed, 22 May 1991 03:22:23 GMT I posted on this earlier, but it seems to have gotten eaten without being sent. In article <7601@rex.cs.tulane.edu> mandel@vax.anes.tulane.edu writes: >If there is one issue which seems not to have generated controversy, it is the >idea of a moderated comp.sources.hp48 group. Unless someone wishes to voice an >objection to that, I plan to proceed with the CFV on that next week, as I >believe it will succeed in short order. I don't like this idea for two reasons: I don't think we need two hp48 specific groups. I really don't think that there is anyone out there who would read c.sources.hp48 and not c.sys.hp48 (or calculators or whatever). So having more then one group would cause all the disadvantages of two groups (multiple mailing lists, mulitple archives, cross posts etc) without any of the advantages of two groups (automatic pruning for people who are not interested in both). Even if the group is created, I would not like to see if moderated. I have been reading c.s.h for over a year, and except for a few requests for asc, and a few requests to be unsubscribed, there haven't been any posts that I would have wanted someone else to discard for me. I urge everyone who is against this to speak up, so we can quash this evil satan-inspired (Just kidding Jeff) idea in the bud. Michael -- Michael Kaufman | I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on kaufman | fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in @eecs.nwu.edu | the dark near the Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be | lost in time - like tears in rain. Time to die. Roy Batty