Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!hpcc05!hparc0!graham
From: graham@hparc0.HP.COM (Graham Eddy)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
Subject: Re: 32 user run-time license (was Re: HP 700 series multi-user performance?)
Message-ID: <1510021@hparc0.HP.COM>
Date: 20 May 91 13:18:40 GMT
References: <1991May6.001128.25216@nntp-server.caltech.edu>
Organization: ARC - Australian Response Centre
Lines: 12

#include <std/disclaimer.h>

i understand "no. users" to be calculated as follows:
    no. users = no. real ttys logged in irrespective of usernames +
		no. userNAMEs logged in over LAN irrespective of no. ptys
i don't say this good.  i don't say it is bad.  i AM saying that if you
don't like it, contact AT&T who impose the silly rule [ok, i say it's
bad :-)].  there is absolutely no point beating on your vendor who is
fulfilling his legal obligations - would you prefer to be dealing with
someone who doesn't recognise his contractual obligations?

-graham