Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!violet.berkeley.edu!ephram
From: ephram@violet.berkeley.edu (Ephram Cohen;B50 Tolman Hall;25352;4156548978;LE56)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: dos 3.3 or 4.01
Message-ID: <1991May22.200236.22682@agate.berkeley.edu>
Date: 22 May 91 20:02:36 GMT
References: <1991May15.191539.30708@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <1991May21.011146.14519@disk.uucp> <1991May21.223053.7138@donner.SanDiego.NCR.COM>
Sender: root@agate.berkeley.edu (Charlie Root)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 10


I have read a number of postings now refering to DOS 4.01 as buggy.  Could
someone be a little more explicit?  What are the problems with DOS 4.01?


-- 
We must prevent those commies from compromising the integrity of our 
precious bodily fluids.      -Gen. Jack D. Ripper
Ephram Cohen                              ephram@violet.berkeley.edu
466 44th St.  #1                          3210 Tolman Hall