Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!mp.cs.niu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!osiris.cso.uiuc.edu!gordon From: gordon@osiris.cso.uiuc.edu (John Gordon) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Subject: Re: dos 3.3 or 4.01 Message-ID: <1991May22.211533.1994@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> Date: 22 May 91 21:15:33 GMT References: <1991May15.191539.30708@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <1991May21.011146.14519@disk.uucp> <1991May21.223053.7138@donner.SanDiego.NCR.COM> <1991May22.200236.22682@agate.berkeley.edu> Sender: usenet@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News) Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana Lines: 14 ephram@violet.berkeley.edu (Ephram Cohen;B50 Tolman Hall;25352;4156548978;LE56) writes: >I have read a number of postings now refering to DOS 4.01 as buggy. Could >someone be a little more explicit? What are the problems with DOS 4.01? I think you may have mis-read the postings. The way I understand it, DOS 4.0 was buggy, but 4.01 is OK. --- John Gordon Internet: gordon@osiris.cso.uiuc.edu #include gordon@cerl.cecer.army.mil #include