Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!ucla-cs!ucla-se!mott!weiss
From: weiss@mott.seas.ucla.edu (Michael Weiss)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: Re: Price cuts on motherboard upgrades ???
Message-ID: <2803@lee.SEAS.UCLA.EDU>
Date: 19 May 91 05:11:21 GMT
References: <674452930.0@blkcat.FidoNet> <3171@shodha.enet.dec.com> <1991May19.033448.23080@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
Sender: news@SEAS.UCLA.EDU
Organization: SEASnet, University of California, Los Angeles
Lines: 15

In article <1991May19.033448.23080@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> nkb@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Norman K Bucknor) writes:
>I sympathize with those wanting 32-bit clean ROM upgrades but I wonder
>about this "Apple promised us" stuff. Does it say anywhere in the documentation
>that Apple *will* provide a ROM upgrade path?

I believe the issue is rather that Apple said that the amount of accessible
memory would be the amount which you can get with 32-bit clean ROMs.  In 
other words, they said that the machines could do things that machines with 
32-bit clean ROMs could do, but that THESE machines could NOT do (without
the upgrade).  Am I making it clear, or am I confusing you still further?
--
\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | /
-  Michael Weiss  weiss@watson.seas.ucla.edu  |  School of Engineering and  -
-                 izzydp5@oac.ucla.edu        |    Applied Science, UCLA    -
/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | \