Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!stanford.edu!neon.Stanford.EDU!pescadero.Stanford.EDU!philip
From: philip@pescadero.Stanford.EDU (Philip Machanick)
Subject: Re: Class-action lawsuit (was Re: Price cuts on motherboard upgrades ???)
Message-ID: <1991May20.003611.24222@neon.Stanford.EDU>
Sender: news@neon.Stanford.EDU (USENET News System)
Reply-To: philip@pescadero.stanford.edu
Organization: Stanford University
References: <1991May19.033448.23080@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <2803@lee.SEAS.UCLA.EDU> <1991May19.164217.10045@odin.corp.sgi.com> <32998@usc>
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 20 May 1991 00:36:11 GMT
Lines: 18

In article <32998@usc>, kurtzman@pollux.usc.edu (Stephen Kurtzman) writes:
|> In article <1991May19.164217.10045@odin.corp.sgi.com> autry@sgi.com (Larry Autry) writes:
|> My manual says the same. In fact, one reason I upgraded from an SE to
|> an SE/30 was to expand my memory capacity. Needless to say, I'm quite
|> upset that Apple's literature misrepresented the capabilities of the
|> machine.
[...]
|> Since Apple has been mute on this problem, perhaps it is time for a
|> class-action lawsuit. Does anyone on the net know of anyone organizing
|> such an effort?

I don't know about lawsuits, but I occasionally write articles for
Computers in Africa, and this looks like it might make a good story.
Does anyone know who in Apple I should contact to get an interview
with management?
-- 
Philip Machanick
philip@pescadero.stanford.edu