Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!spool.mu.edu!cs.umn.edu!kksys!edgar!saylor!macgate!Uucp
From: Jim.Spencer@p510.f22.n282.z1.fidonet.org (Jim Spencer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: 32 bit addressing
Message-ID: <674629203.8@macgate.fidonet>
Date: 18 May 91 04:03:15 GMT
Article-I.D.: macgate.674629203.8
Sender: Uucp@p0.f22.n282.z1.fidonet.org
Lines: 16


Lawrence Reed Miller writes in a message to All

LRM> Hmmm. Perhaps because instead of buying a IIfx or IIci to get 
> 11-14MB of
LRM> memory, we'll go out and buy NeXTs (or SPARCs, or...). Customer 
LRM> loyalty is an important thing, because at some point in the future, 
LRM> those of us who purchased non-32 bit clean Macs are going to 
LRM> need to buy new machines. Having already recieved one machine 
LRM> which fails to perform as advertised (and as specified in the 
LRM> manual), how anxious are you to purchase another possibly defective 
LRM> machine from Apple? 

What nonsense.  First, do you really think that NeXT or Sun will treat you better.  Hell, for most machines the problem would arise to begin with because you wouldn't be getting a free upgrade.  Second, unless you have a problem most of us don't, your machine is NOT defective.  It does exactly what it was designed to do in exactly the way it was designed to do it.
 
 * Origin: White Mailer Test Point (1.0d6) (1:282/22.510)