Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!cs.umn.edu!msi.umn.edu!math.fu-berlin.de!fub!tmpmbx!netmbx!perstoro
From: perstoro@netmbx.UUCP (Wilhelm Schaefer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: Why NextStep is not on RS/6000
Message-ID: <2335@netmbx.UUCP>
Date: 18 May 91 14:22:36 GMT
References: <1991May16.212049.19976@menudo.uh.edu> <4cHd_76@cs.psu.edu> <1991May17.043502.8931@menudo.uh.edu>
Organization: netmbx, Berlin, Germany
Lines: 15



> I would like to see that contract because if what the rep says is true
>then some lawyer is in deep sh*t. Because for 10 million++ I would think
>IBM would of get the rights to NeXTstep version 30.0 not 2.0....But I would
>not be surprised by Steve....seeing how Apple never let any Mac clones to
>get built......                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^...
In my opinion this was (is) the reason that IBM-DOS had conquered
the market. Let's hope steve wan't do the same mistake again, else
the user would had have to suffer the consequences again...


so long

	       -- --- good old perstoro --- --