Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!sun!amdcad!dgcad!dg-rtp!rti!bcw From: bcw@rti.rti.org (Bruce Wright) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Subject: Re: strange behavior from the new Winqvt (4.65) ?? Message-ID: <1991May21.205538.4717@rti.rti.org> Date: 21 May 91 20:55:38 GMT References: <3398@travis.csd.harris.com> <1991May19.171201.4651@isc.rit.edu> Distribution: na Organization: Research Triangle Institute, RTP, NC Lines: 35 In article <1991May19.171201.4651@isc.rit.edu> cms2839@isc.rit.edu (a.stranger) writes: > my problems with winqvt 4.65 are completely >different from that of the previous poster's ( which i have not seen ) . >specifically : [...] > >o the screen length is not recognized by VMS , which assumes a 25 ( 24 ? ) > line screen no matter what it is sized to . I can't comment much on winqvt (I don't use it), but I can make a few comments about using terminals on VMS. The typical DEC terminals attached to a VMS system didn't have a report that would return the number of lines on a screen until recently (the VT420). Versions of VMS before V5.4 do not recognize the VT420; moreover, even V5.4 does not request the appropriate report from the terminal. (As far as I know the only time that VMS gets the page length right is when you are running from a workstation - but my understanding of winqvt is that it doesn't look like a DECwindows server, so it doesn't get the page length right). On all other terminals VMS assumes a page length of 24. Maybe they will fix this in V5.5 of VMS, but even then VMS probably won't ask for the page length unless your emulator reports that it's a VT420. You can override this in your LOGIN.COM file by adding a line like $ SET TERM/PAGE=48 (or whatever). Note that EDT will still assume a 24-line screen, and even worse will set your scrolling region to 24 lines when it exits (grrr !! grrrr !!). But you should probably use TPU anyway, it will use a big screen properly, and is much faster and more powerful. Emacs should also work but I'm not so sure it would be any faster than TPU ;-). Good luck - Bruce C. Wright