Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!udel!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!Eng.Sun.COM From: Robert.Allen@Eng.Sun.COM (Email Mujahideen) Newsgroups: rec.guns Subject: Re: guns advertized as "functioning reliably underwater"? Message-ID: <34769@mimsy.umd.edu> Date: 22 May 91 16:38:35 GMT Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mt. View, Ca. Lines: 35 Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu In article <34737@mimsy.umd.edu> n9020351@unicorn.cc.wwu.edu (James D. Del Vecchio) writes: + + Re: Concealed carry piece for scuba divers + + I've heard some guns advertized as "functioning reliably underwater", +I think the Glock was one of these and also CZ 99 might have been one. +Is this possible? What would happen if someone tried this? I would +think that hollow points might expand as they travled the barrel. + I saw a plug for the Jericho 941 where they had it in a mud puddle and +it still worked. + + I would like a gun that is impervious to water, one where I could store it +in the toilet tank if I wanted to, with no harm to the gun. +I want something with no corrodible parts to worry about. What is better: +stainless or chrome? I've seen 'stainless' silverware with corrosion on +it before, but I'm not sure how strong chrome can be made. Are there any +steel alloys with some chrome in them, or that can be made _totaly non +corrodable_? + + A Glock in stainless would be nice (especialy one with a grip safety, +rather than a trigger safety, can Glocks be modified?) I've "heard tell" that Glocks are HIGHLY rust-resistant due to the coating on all the metal parts, but I don't think I'd trust to long term underwater storage. Certainly I wouldn't trust ammo to such storage. Why not just put it in a zip-lock bag if you want to store it under water? -- Robert Allen, rja@sun.com DISCLAIMER: I disclaim everything. "The intelligent man is one who has successfully fulfilled many accomplishments, and is yet willing to learn more." - Ed Parker