Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!apple!veritas!amdcad!amdcad!military From: daly@strawber.princeton.edu (John Daly) Newsgroups: sci.military Subject: Re: Vulnerability of modern fighters Message-ID: <1991May18.050951.10890@amd.com> Date: 17 May 91 13:41:15 GMT References: <1991May15.060829.3052@amd.com> <1991May16.052804.17718@amd.com> <1991May17.063036.1080@amd.com> Sender: military@amd.com Organization: Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (CFD) Lines: 30 Approved: military@amd.com From: daly@strawber.princeton.edu (John Daly) ELEC140@csc.canterbury.ac.nz (Chris Kaiser) writes: >henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) writes: >> 80%+ of all victims of air combat never even see the attacker, much less >> have a chance to maneuver against him. I suspect this is still true. Most good pilots can evade what they can see. > 1) What are the limitations of a fighter's radar? Do aircraft such as the F-14 > or Tornado interceptor have an all-round (ie. 360 degree) radar capability? No. It's more like a 120 degree cone in front of the nose. This is why a controller (eg: AWACS) is so valuable in air-to-air conflicts. A friend of an A-7 pilot explained to me how his A-7 downed an F-14 in a navy exercise. The A-7 was cruising at low altitude when the pilot found himself in visual contact with a Tomcat high above him and headed away. The A-7 went to full military power and climbed. It took a while to catch up to the F-14, but he managed to score a similuated kill. The F-14 has a radar with a 150 mile range, but the crew still has to "check six". The most important component in a fighter is an alert aircrew. Otherwise, a Tomcat's no harder to shoot down than a Cessna. > 2) If they have radar blind spots (such as to the rear) do they have any means > to detect the radar emissions of other aircraft? (eg. an enemy fighter with a > radar lock on them from the rear) Yes. It's similar to the device you buy for your car to detect police radar.