Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!m.cs.uiuc.edu!kadie From: kadie@m.cs.uiuc.edu (Carl M. Kadie) Newsgroups: comp.admin.policy Subject: Re: harassing mail Message-ID: <1991May23.131100.8436@m.cs.uiuc.edu> Date: 23 May 91 13:11:00 GMT References: <1991May21.232534.17880@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> <1991May22.004900.21797@athena.cs.uga.edu> <1991May22.040819.29865@m.cs.uiuc.edu> <1991May22.124033.3668@athena.cs.uga.edu> <1991May23.023441.8112@osh3.OSHA.GOV> Organization: University of Illinois, Dept. of Comp. Sci., Urbana, IL Lines: 49 >>In article <1991May22.040819.29865@m.cs.uiuc.edu> >> kadie@m.cs.uiuc.edu (Carl M. Kadie) writes: [...] >>>How does this compare with your university's general policies? Does >>>your university prohibit "embarassing" student organizations from >>>using "free" university resources such as building space for meetings >>>or talks? chip@osh3.OSHA.GOV (Chip Yamasaki) writes: >I don't know about their policies, but in Mikes defense I would have to >guess YES. If the student organization is gathering for something >purely defamatory like a "The dean is a fink" rally, I do think they >would deny use of campus resources. Mike certainly wasn't talking about >topics or content that would be controversial but, as he said in another >post, harassing. [...] I don't think a "the dean is a fink" rally (or e-mail) should count as harrassment. The Joint Statement on Rights and Freedoms of Students, the main expression of student academic freedom in the US, says: --(begin quote) --- B. Freedom of Inquiry and Expression 1. Students and student organizations should be free to examine and discuss all questions of interest to them, and to express opinions publicly and privately. They should always be free to support causes by orderly means which do not disrupt the regular and essential operation of the institution. At the same time, it should be made clear to the academic and the larger community that in their public expressions or demonstrations students or student organizations speak only for themselves. 2. Students should be allowed to invite and to hear any person of their own choosing. Those routine procedures required by an institution before a guest speaker is invited to appear on campus should be designed only to insure that there is orderly scheduling of facilities and adequate preparation for the event, and that the occasion is conducted in a manner appropriate to an academic community. The institutional control of campus facilities should not be used as a device of censorship. It should be made clear to the academic and larger community that sponsorship of guest speakers does not necessarily imply approval or endorsement of the views expressed, either by the sponsoring group or the institution. --(end quote) --- -- Carl Kadie -- kadie@cs.uiuc.edu -- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign