Xref: utzoo comp.admin.policy:99 comp.unix.admin:1982 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!rice!hsdndev!dartvax!mars!nic!kira!news From: cavrak@kira.UUCP (Steve Cavrak) Newsgroups: comp.admin.policy,comp.unix.admin Subject: Re: E-mail Privacy Message-ID: <1991May26.124126.25336@uvm.edu> Date: 26 May 91 12:41:26 GMT References: <15110@ccncsu.ColoState.EDU> Sender: news@uvm.edu Organization: Univ. of Vermont, Eng., Math., and Bus. Admin. (EMBA) Computer Facility Lines: 54 conca@handel.cs.colostate.edu (michael vincen conca): > > Now for the tough questions. > Is this legal? Is this ethical? If this person still worked > here, I would immediately refuse. But since they don't, do they still > have any rights to their E-mail? Right now, I am leaning towards refusing > because I think a person's E-mail is theirs, regardless of their status > with the organization. Anyone have any other opinions on this? > > -Mike > Mike, I think that your approach is the correct one. (The original errors were in sending the notice via email in the first place, and that was compounded by not having a copy. But that is neither here nor there.) What I would do is a. may a copy of the backup tape so that it can be archived in storage. b. state your position to the supervisor. It would be nice if you had a copy of the university's (computer center) policy on this handy, or C. Suggest that the both of your work with the University's Personnel department and Legal Counsel to see what options are available. You may end up with a very big meeting with a lot of folks involved; certainly university computer service folks. D. My own suggestion is that it is best to leave the backup tape untouched (and untouchable) and restore the files only in the face of real legal action. The supervisor doesn't really NEED the copy NOW, s/he just wants it to cover his/her ass IN CASE. Well, the ass is uncovered, and we've all got pictures of it. So learn s/he should learnd to walk around that way with pride and dignity -- s/he might just start a fashion trend !! In all likelyhood, the employee will go off and get another job elsewhere. If there is an appeal, then the supervisor will have to admit to a less than perfect implementation of his/her decision (not really a serious error in any case -- since there must be other documentation on the case). At this point, you would get to the first NEED for a document, and the whole thing would be brought up as in C, but C would have prepared everyone for this in anycase and may have even thought up an answer. See ya Steve