Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!wuarchive!uunet!munnari.oz.au!goanna!ok
From: ok@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au (Richard A. O'Keefe)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: What's in the '586?
Summary: joke
Message-ID: <5938@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au>
Date: 24 May 91 03:22:48 GMT
References: <8840035@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM> <42573@cup.portal.com> <1991May23.153404.16581@linus.mitre.org>
Organization: Comp Sci, RMIT, Melbourne, Australia
Lines: 11

In article <1991May23.153404.16581@linus.mitre.org>, jfjr@mbunix.mitre.org (Freedman) writes:
: In article <1991May23.022846.8853@netcom.COM> feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) writes:
: >You're raising the possibility that the drug test results were rigged
: >to get you and your buddies off the project. Would you care to state
: >for the record whether you felt the drug tests were accurate?
: I have found that, in regard to urine tests, neatness counts.

I thought urine tests were always passed?
-- 
I rejoiced that at least So-and-So could spell "hierarchical",
but the _real_ explanation was that he couldn't spell "heir".	-me