Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!littlei!intelhf!ichips!pdx041!chrisj From: chrisj@pdx041.intel.com (Chris Jones) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: What's in the '586? Message-ID: <1991May24.153126.1468@ichips.intel.com> Date: 24 May 91 15:31:26 GMT References: <5814@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au> <1991May18.161515.22428@leland.Stanford.EDU> <1991May21.191242.4591@sbcs.sunysb.edu> <1991May22.014604.13983@ims.alaska.edu> Sender: news@ichips.intel.com (News Account) Reply-To: chrisj@ichips.intel.com Followup-To: comp.arch Organization: INTEL X86 Focus Group Lines: 30 In article <1991May22.014604.13983@ims.alaska.edu>, floyd@ims.alaska.edu (Floyd Davidson) writes: > In article <1991May21.191242.4591@sbcs.sunysb.edu> jallen@eeserv1.ic.sunysb.edu (Joseph Allen) writes: >> My God, what am I saying? I hope there arn't any marketing people reading >> comp.arch... >> >> That is the real problem with this joke. It was funny as hell, but >> what if some Intel marketing people see it? Look how many people >> here couldn't tell it was a joke. How many of... Oh never mind... You think YOU'RE worried about Intel marketing people reading this column... :-) Seriously folks, I've enjoyed reading this discussion and watching the mayhem that a couple of funny postings can cause. I notice that there are a lot of intel-bashers out there. OK, so maybe not everybody agrees with the latest and greatest(?) coming out of this company, but remember a cople of things: 1) Intel is a business, and by nature wants to make money. 2) REAL mode might be a thing of the past if not for... well, you know. Wish I could comment. :-) --Chris +----------------------------------+------------------------------------------+ { Chris S Jones, Intel Corp. | The opinions expressed above probably do } { 5200 NE Elam Young Pkwy, JF1-58 | not reflect the opinions of Intel. If } { Hillsboro, OR 97124 | they actually do reflect the opinions of } { chrisj@ichips.intel.com | Intel, it is purely coincidental, since } { (503) 696-4022 | Intel would never comment on such matters} +----------------------------------+------------------------------------------+