Xref: utzoo comp.unix.sysv386:8443 comp.lang.c:39607
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!batcomputer!caen!math.lsa.umich.edu!sharkey!news.iastate.edu!hobbes.physics.uiowa.edu!ns-mx!uunet!ukma!rex!samsung!olivea!mintaka!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!ukc!tcdcs!wsl!jja
From: jja@wsl.ie (John Allen on wsl)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386,comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: time(0L) - I'm sorry, I can't resist
Message-ID: <777@wsl.ie>
Date: 24 May 91 11:44:45 GMT
References: <381@tmcsys.UUCP> <tim.674902529@holly> <1200@applix.com>
Reply-To: jja@wsl.ie (John Allen on wsl)
Followup-To: comp.unix.sysv386
Organization: Workhorse Systems Limited, Dublin
Lines: 13

In article <1200@applix.com> scotte@applix.UUCP (Scott Evernden) writes:
>Someone, please, anyone- 
>Name for me any modern computer in any kind of common use which will
>barf at:
>
>	time(0L);
>
>-scott

I suppose this is a good a reason as you can come up with to do it 
inorrectly.

You belong to the old school of 'we used to do it wrong, we still do it wrong'