Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!tellab5!chinet!cgk
From: cgk@chinet.chi.il.us (Charlie Kester)
Newsgroups: comp.os.misc
Subject: Requesting opinions on QNX
Message-ID: <1991May25.131221.25518@chinet.chi.il.us>
Date: 25 May 91 13:12:21 GMT
Organization: Chinet - Public Access UNIX
Lines: 15

Would anyone like to share their experience with or opinion of QNX?  We are
considering going to it for our PC-based control systems. 

Specifically, is the message-based architecture as good as claimed? Is the
interrupt response time as good as claimed? What about support and third
party products?

I know that a new POSIX-compliant version of QNX is about to be released;
any opinions on that?


-- 
Charlie Kester      |  cgk@chinet.chi.il.us   | "Wretches, utter wretches!
1503 Larson Street  |                         |  keep your hands from beans!"
Sycamore IL 60178   |                         |       (Empedocles)