Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!uidaho!med.cs.uidaho.edu!oman From: oman@med.cs.uidaho.edu Newsgroups: comp.software-eng Subject: Re: CASE tools for the PC Message-ID: <1991May24.181351.16296@groucho> Date: 24 May 91 18:13:51 GMT References: <1991May23.163451.47885@cc.usu.edu> Sender: @groucho Organization: University of Idaho Lines: 32 Nntp-Posting-Host: med.cs.uidaho.edu In article <1991May23.163451.47885@cc.usu.edu> campbell@cc.usu.edu (Russell Anderson) writes: >I would like to know if anyone has a recommendation for a CASE tool to be >used on the PC? I have seen a couple. > Easycase can be purchased as shareware and it is a toy. > I have seen a demo of the Iconix on a Mac and it seems good. > >Any experience? I've used EasyCASE, TurboCASE, System Architect, MacBubbles, Excelerator, Info. Eng. Workbench, Anatool, Powertools, Teamwork, and probably 2-3 others. Here's my opinion: TurboCASE is unsurpassed for the Mac, System Architect is very good for the Win 3.0 environment because it has embedded SQL, and EasyCASE is the best for a DOS environment. Note, you used the shareware version of EasyCASE: What did you expect? Try their professional version, it's definitely worth the money (about $300). Also, you shouldn't expect much from a DOS-based CASE tool because you don't have multiple views into the design (like you do with the tools running on Macs, Win 3.0, OS/2, and X-Windows). The bottom line is that it's hard to separate the CASE power from the OS platform -- the more flexible the platform, the more flexible the tool. The best front-end CASE tools I've seen, run on the Mac or under X-Windows. Win 3.0 and OS/2 tools are improving, though. Paul Oman ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Paul W. Oman, Ph.D., C.S. Dept., Univ. of Idaho, Moscow, ID, 83843 -- -- em: oman@cs.uidaho.edu ph: 208-885-6589 fx: 208-885-6645 -- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------