Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!yale!hsdndev!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Casting Function Pointers
Message-ID: <16272@smoke.brl.mil>
Date: 27 May 91 02:12:26 GMT
References: <1991May24.005025.7714@tkou02.enet.dec.com> <16259@smoke.brl.mil> <1991May27.003536.25876@tkou02.enet.dec.com>
Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD.
Lines: 10

In article <1991May27.003536.25876@tkou02.enet.dec.com> diamond@jit533.enet@tkou02.enet.dec.com (Norman Diamond) writes:
>In article <16259@smoke.brl.mil> gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) writes:
>>I'm not aware of any changes between the final draft of K&R2 (first printing)
>>and the official C standard that would make K&R2 less correct; however, there
>>was at least one change that made K&R2 more nearly correct.
>dmr posted a list of changes about two years ago.

While that's true, it doesn't invalidate what I said.  The only substantive
change of any note in the errata list that could be blamed on late changes
in the draft standard was CLK_TCK => CLOCKS_PER_SEC.