Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!spool.mu.edu!cs.umn.edu!kksys!edgar!orac!bret From: bret@orac.UUCP (Bret Indrelee) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: An interesting idea... Summary: Power of '30 in '85 Message-ID: <325@orac.UUCP> Date: 23 May 91 01:52:09 GMT Article-I.D.: orac.325 References: <1991May14.125542.9479@sugar.hackercorp.com> Organization: Technix Inc., Saint Paul MN, USA Lines: 30 In article <1991May14.125542.9479@sugar.hackercorp.com> peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) writes: >In article melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger) writes: >> Amiga is great, I can't easily refute it? Correct. When people tell >> me that the blitter awesome, but then we find out that it is >> equivalent to a 68030 in processing power. Don't worry I'm learning. > >68030 processing power in a $500 machine is indeed awesome. > >. The Amiga came out in '85. There were not any '30 based anything then. Also, the blitter takes care of graphics. I know I can find a better use for the '30 CPU than drawing characters on the screen. Hopefully, (hint, hint) C= will come out with a blitter with a 32 bit data bus soon. Right now, the blitter with a 16 bit data bus is about as fast as a '30 using 32-bit accesses. The blitter is great. Just ask the graphics guru's. I have notes from a SIGGRAPH '84 class on using the blitbit primitive to do all kinds of great stuff. The TI chips that lots of graphics boards use as processors have a blitbit operation. Amiga had it in '85. In silicon. On a personal computer. -Bret -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bret Indrelee | bret@orac.edgar.mn.org | ;^)