Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.graphics
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!n8emr!bluemoon!moonhawk
From: moonhawk@bluemoon.uucp (David Culberson)
Subject: Re: ColorBurst NTSC @ LA VideoExpo
Message-ID: <ZRHk32w164w@bluemoon.uucp>
Sender: bbs@bluemoon.uucp (BBS Login)
Organization: Blue Moon BBS ((614) 868-998[0][2][4])
References: <91145.032250ACPS1072@Ryerson.CA>
Date: Sun, 26 May 91 14:41:34 EDT

ACPS1072@RYERSON <ACPS1072@Ryerson.CA> writes:

> drives).  The SUNs also house a RISC chip, compared to the CISC processor
> (680x0) in the Amiga.

        I read that the 68040 is faster than the Sun's processor, and that 
a GVP 3050 board is faster than an '040, so a 3050 equipped Amiga is 
faster than a Sun. I didn't read this in AmigaWhirled.
                        David

Now the world has gone to bed,  MoonHawk@Bluemoon.uucp          ////|all
Darkness won't engulf my head,  moonhawk%bluemoon@nstar.rn.com //// |hail
I can see by infrared,                                     \\\\///__|the
How I hate the night.      Yeah, this IS an annoying SIG.   \\\\/   |miga