Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga.misc:3888 comp.sys.amiga.programmer:3842 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!crdgw1!uunet!munnari.oz.au!bruce!monu0.cc.monash.edu.au!monu6!rda136k From: rda136k@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au (Simon Cocking) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.amiga.programmer Subject: Re: So, how close is WB2.0 to a burn-in date? Message-ID: <1991May23.102546.19130@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> Date: 23 May 91 10:25:46 GMT References: <1991May20.170355.19033@coplex.uucp> <1991May22.145109.2627@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> <1991May22.161900.26502@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <1991May22.191722.20379@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> Organization: Department of RDT, Monash Uni Lines: 18 jap@convex.cl.msu.edu (Joe Porkka) writes: >Do Amiga500's and Amiga2000's have an extra ROM socket to hold 2.0 in? >If not I'm sure we will soon see ROM extender hacks to allow people >to put 512k 2.0ROMS in those machine. >Hopefully this will happen for A1000s too, since I own one :-) This is something I've been wondering about too for a while... the A500 has no extra ROM socket, and the existing socket should be too small (ie, not enough pins) to accomodate a 512k ROM. How does C= intend for this to be done? -- /// ^^^^^ __ /// (o o) Didn't 25 years of Doctor \\\/// Simon Cocking, ^ Who teach you not to trust \XX/ rda136k@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au `-' names like Intel & Zilog?