Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!lll-winken!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!widener!netnews.upenn.edu!msuinfo!convex.cl.msu.edu!jap
From: jap@convex.cl.msu.edu (Joe Porkka)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: CShell 5.10, arp stuff, A3000 w/2.0; should they go together
Keywords: CShell arp A3000 2.0
Message-ID: <1991May23.181415.21678@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu>
Date: 23 May 91 18:14:15 GMT
References: <1845@contex.contex.com>
Sender: news@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu
Organization: Michigan State University
Lines: 30

jeff@contex.contex.com (Jeff Carey) writes:

>(Please let me know if you have seen this already, we are having
> trouble with our news posting mechanisms.)

>I don't know if this is the correct newsgroup for this question,
>but anyhow...

>I have recently bought a A3000, and have acquired the PD source to
>CShell 5.10 (I think).

>Being a Unix programmer by profession, I thought this might be useful.

>Well, when I tried to compile said source I discovered that I also
>needed arp.
>So, I got the arp 1.3 distribution.

>Well, the CShell still doesn't compile.  There are a series of structures
>that are defined in both arp's include files as well as in asl.h or dosasl.h.
>I am running Lattice/SAS C compiler 5.10a.


Try installing the 1.3 includes.
The 2.0 includes define a bunch of stuff which looks an awfull lot
like the Arp includes. So instead of fighting with it
the easiest thing to do is to use the 1.3 includes.

The only problem then is that you lose out on access to the 2.0
features which require stuff from the 2.0 includes. Since your'e
trying to get a pre2.0 program to compile this will not be a problem.