Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!ukc!icdoc!sot-ecs!efp90
From: efp90@ecs.soton.ac.uk (Pritchard EF)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: Question on AbortIO() and WaitIO()
Message-ID: <7803@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: 23 May 91 15:23:40 GMT
References: <28630@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU> <7753@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <21785@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Sender: news@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Lines: 18

In <21785@cbmvax.commodore.com> bj@cbmvax.commodore.com (Brian Jackson) writes:


>The GetMsg() is *not* required. He is (properly) doing a WaitIO()
>after the AbortIO() call and WaitIO() *does* remove the message.

Oops! Thanks for picking me up on that, Brain!

>Brian

> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> | Brian Jackson  Software Engineer, Commodore-Amiga Inc.  GEnie: B.J. |
> | bj@cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com    or  ...{uunet|rutgers}!cbmvax!bj     |
> | "Sometimes the hamster falls asleep inside the little wheel..."     |
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------

E.F.Pritchard.
efp90