Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!lll-winken!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!widener!dsinc!bagate!cbmvax!jesup
From: jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com (Randell Jesup)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: CShell 5.10, arp stuff, A3000 w/2.0; should they go together
Keywords: CShell arp A3000 2.0
Message-ID: <21913@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Date: 25 May 91 01:29:52 GMT
References: <1845@contex.contex.com> <28943@neptune.inf.ethz.ch>
Reply-To: jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com (Randell Jesup)
Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA
Lines: 15

In article <28943@neptune.inf.ethz.ch> umueller@iiic.ethz.ch (Urban Dominik Mueller) writes:
>>Is arp NEEDED with WB2.0?
>No. In fact, WB2.0 replaces arp in many respects. The main reason why
>I still use arp is that I want to be kickstart 1.3 compatible. And
>because WB2.0 has given me no replacement for SyncRun() (I need a
>function that uses the current process).

	RunCommand(seglist,stacksize,arguments,argument length).  This is what
is used by the system shell to run commands on your process.

-- 
Randell Jesup, Jack-of-quite-a-few-trades, Commodore Engineering.
{uunet|rutgers}!cbmvax!jesup, jesup@cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com  BIX: rjesup  
Disclaimer: Nothing I say is anything other than my personal opinion.
"No matter where you go, there you are."  - Buckaroo Banzai