Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga.misc:3942 comp.sys.amiga.programmer:3910 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!batcomputer!caen!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!linus!agate!ucbvax!van-bc!ubc-cs!alberta!aunro!ukma!rex!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ncar!hsdndev!rutgers!cbmvax!cbmehq!cbmfra!swindj!didierj From: didierj@swindj.UUCP (Alain Didierjean) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.amiga.programmer Subject: Re: So, how close is WB2.0 to a burn-in date? Message-ID: <1930b95f.ARN1430@swindj.UUCP> Date: 24 May 91 09:26:23 GMT References: <1991May20.170355.19033@coplex.uucp> <1991May22.145109.2627@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> <1991May22.161900.26502@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Reply-To: didierj@cbmfra Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.amiga.programmer Organization: The Software Winery Lines: 19 In article <1991May22.161900.26502@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>, Ethan Solomita writes: -> In article <1991May22.145109.2627@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> jap@convex.cl.msu.edu (Joe Porkka) writes: -> > -> >There is no reason not to have 2.0 on all amigas (including CDTV). -> >The only difference between game players and power users is the hardware -> >and software addons they buy for their machines. -> -> That's not really true. CDTV, running under a variant of -> 1.3, uses a 512K kickstart with special routines on it, so you -> can't just plug in a 2.0 kickstart. And considering that 2.0KS is -> already totally filled, there would be no room for the CDTV -> specific code. Also, I wonder what 2.0 look would become on a TV set, PAL or NTSC. I'm talking about subtle shades and highlights, specifically vertical thin ones. Anybody tested 2.0 on his home TV set yet ? Alain DIDIERJEAN tfd.com!afp!gna!swindj!didierj The Software Winery cbmvax!cbmehq!cbmfra!swindj!didierj