Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!dali.cs.montana.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!casbah.acns.nwu.edu!ftpbox!mothost!fwhnm02!mmuegel
From: mmuegel@fwhnm02.fwrdc.rtsg.mot.com (Michael S. Muegel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo
Subject: Re: nfs/rpc question
Message-ID: <1991May23.155240.897@fwhnm02.fwrdc.rtsg.mot.com>
Date: 23 May 91 15:52:40 GMT
References: <1991May23.055131.14273@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu>
Reply-To: mmuegel@mot.com
Organization: Cellular Infrastructure Group, Motorola, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas
Lines: 20

In article <1991May23.055131.14273@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> christos@theory.TC.Cornell.EDU (Christos S. Zoulas) writes:
>
>Of-course with irritating slowness of NFS, I am really starting to question
>if it is worth all the trouble. It feels that the remote filesystems are 
>made out of floppies :( Is 2.2 any better?

NFS2.2 is much better and I would highly recommend it. I would not say it
is the best NFS out there (Not by a long shot) but it is a heck of a lot
better than 2.1.

-Mike

-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Mike Muegel                              | Internet: mmuegel@mot.com        |
| Software Tools Group                     | UUCP:     uunet!motcid!muegel    |
| Fort Worth Research & Development Center | Voice:    (817) 232-6129         |
| Radio Telephone and Systems Group        | ... My opinions are surely not   |
| Motorola, Inc.                           |     shared by Motorola :-&       |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+