Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!uunet!olivea!oliveb!veritas!amdcad!brahms!phil From: phil@brahms.amd.com (Phil Ngai) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Subject: Re: 486SX - Intel now telling lies Message-ID: <1991May24.171506.4370@amd.com> Date: 24 May 91 17:15:06 GMT References: <1991May14.200856.1431@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <1991May15.210339.17118@unlv.edu> <1561@aoa.UUCP> <1991May23.205937.25386@rodan.acs.syr.edu> Sender: usenet@amd.com (NNTP Posting) Distribution: usa Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Lines: 28 amichiel@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Allen J Michielsen) writes: > The NEW 486-sx is a full 486 with the coprocessor EXCLUDED. Several trade The 486sx is only rated at 20 MHz. If it ran faster, it would overlap market segment-wise with the 486dx-25, and Intel would never let that happen. Of course, we will now see two postings a week in this group about pushing their 486-sx to 25 MHz and where to buy a 25 MHz crystal and how you could burn out the chip if you run it for too long at high speed, just like a car. Ever thought about whether these chip pushers would have hot-rodded cars in an earlier time? >prices or below, and really squeeze down the market. However, after you have >a cheap clone 486sx system, you can add a coprocessor at anytime, simply by >replacing the 486sx with a 486-dx (or whatever they call it,..,.). On the No, you can't do that. Intel wants to make sure people pay a premium for coprocessors, so the 486sx has a different pinout from the 486dx and you can't just drop it in. Furthermore, the 487sx has yet another different pinout so you can't drop that in either. This is called intentional incompatibility. -- The media is in the business of distorting people's perception of reality, by emphasising the out of the ordinary.