Newsgroups: comp.sys.sgi Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!aurora.physics.utoronto.ca!sysmark From: sysmark@aurora.physics.utoronto.ca (Mark Bartelt) Subject: Re: wondering when/whether our 3.3.2 will arrive ... Message-ID: <1991May24.140153.12340@helios.physics.utoronto.ca> Sender: news@helios.physics.utoronto.ca (News Administrator) Nntp-Posting-Host: aurora.physics.utoronto.ca Reply-To: mark@cita.toronto.edu Organization: University of Toronto Physics/Astronomy/CITA References: <1991May17.093936.28501@helios.physics.utoronto.ca> <1991May17.143713.10728@mmm.serc.3m.com> <1991May17.194546.8546@odin.corp.sgi.com> Date: Fri, 24 May 1991 14:01:53 GMT In article <1991May17.194546.8546@odin.corp.sgi.com> bobg@rains.wpd.sgi.com (Bob Green) writes: | For systems which had already been shipped, the maintenance packaging of | this release (3 tapes) was shipped to only those customers on maintenance | contracts who had encountered problems fixed by this release. And how does SGI *know* which customers have encountered problems fixed by this release? Presumably the tapes went only to customers who had reported such bugs to SGI. But I'd expect that there are many more customers who may need or want the updates. Perhaps they encountered bugs but found some sort of workaround. Perhaps there are customers who haven't yet encountered one or more of these bugs, but might (tomorrow? next week? next month?). All in all, I think that the policy described above is rather shoddy. When we bought in to our maintenance contract, we were told that we'd automatically be getting *all* updates. No mention was ever made that we might or might not get them, depending on SGI's whim. Does anyone else feel a bit peeved by this, or am I just being overly cranky about it? Mark Bartelt 416/978-5619 Canadian Institute for mark@cita.toronto.edu Theoretical Astrophysics mark@cita.utoronto.ca