Xref: utzoo comp.admin.policy:88 comp.unix.admin:1965
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!mips!spool.mu.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ncoast!jeffl
From: jeffl@NCoast.ORG (Jeff Leyser)
Newsgroups: comp.admin.policy,comp.unix.admin
Subject: Re: E-mail Privacy
Message-ID: <1991May24.174455.12168@NCoast.ORG>
Date: 24 May 91 17:44:55 GMT
References: <1991May23.133507.21460@NCoast.ORG> <1991May23.155851.4496@m.cs.uiuc.edu> <1991May23.172155.28633@decuac.dec.com>
Organization: North Coast Public Access Un*x (ncoast)
Lines: 14

In post <1991May23.172155.28633@decuac.dec.com>, mjr@hussar.dco.dec.com (Marcus J. Ranum) says:
!!kadie@m.cs.uiuc.edu (Carl M. Kadie) writes:
!!	All the time, USENET seems to entertain itself by hypothesizing
!!about The Law, and what it SHOULD or should not do, but the sad fact of
!!the matter is that the legal system is designed so that the only way to
!!make a really meaningful statement of fact about a situation is to feed
!!a lawyer and get a decision.

Not so.  The only way to make a really meaningful statement of fact about a
situation is to feed a JUDGE and get a decision.  Lawyers, like USENET, give
opinions only.  Lawyers just get paid a whole lot more.
-- 
Jeff Leyser                                     jeffl@ncoast.org
Opinions?  I thought this was typing practice!  leyser@tsa.attmail.com