Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rpi!think.com!paperboy!meissner
From: meissner@osf.org (Michael Meissner)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.internals
Subject: Re: Fundamental defect of the concept of shared libraries
Message-ID: <MEISSNER.91May24200739@curley.osf.org>
Date: 25 May 91 00:07:39 GMT
References: <215@titccy.cc.titech.ac.jp> <1991May22.063425.26144@kithrup.COM>
	<225@titccy.cc.titech.ac.jp> <1991May23.082658.4881@kithrup.COM>
Sender: news@OSF.ORG
Organization: Open Software Foundation
Lines: 34
In-reply-to: sef@kithrup.COM's message of 23 May 91 08:26:58 GMT

In article <1991May23.082658.4881@kithrup.COM> sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan) writes:

| In article <225@titccy.cc.titech.ac.jp> mohta@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta) writes:
| >You poor boy, such an old trick is already known to me. I sometimes use
| >the trick if it is possible.
| >The problem here is that "jal" is not PC-relative.
| 
| *sigh*
| Fine.  How about:
| 
| 	mov	1, $at
| 	bgezal	$at, foo1$
| 	nop
| foo1$:
| 	mov	$r31, $at

Well actually, the move of 1 to $at is unnessary, since you already
have 0 in $0, and the test is >= 0.

	
	.set	noreorder
	.set	noat
	bgezal	$0, foo1$
	nop
foo1$:
	mov	$r31, $at
	.set	at
	.set	reorder

--
Michael Meissner	email: meissner@osf.org		phone: 617-621-8861
Open Software Foundation, 11 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA, 02142

You are in a twisty little passage of standards, all conflicting.