Xref: utzoo comp.unix.aix:5313 comp.unix.programmer:1904 comp.unix.questions:31647
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!rstanton
From: rstanton@leland.Stanford.EDU (Richard Stanton)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix,comp.unix.programmer,comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: HELP! "Segmentation fault(coredump)" - Problem solved.
Message-ID: <1991May25.053214.907@leland.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 25 May 91 05:32:14 GMT
References: <1991May23.090946.4000@leland.Stanford.EDU> <1991May23.232950.27551@minyos.xx.rmit.oz.au>
Organization: Stanford GSB
Lines: 9


Thanks to everyone who responded to my request for help. It turned out to
be a bug in my code (what a surprise), where an argument to fscanf was the
variable temp, rather than a pointer to the variable.

What is odd is that the bug got past MSDOS, VAX and lint on the RS/6000.

Richard Stanton
pstanton@gsb-lira.stanford.edu