Xref: utzoo comp.sys.dec:5828 comp.unix.ultrix:7347 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!deccrl!news.crl.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!shodha.enet.dec.com!alan From: alan@shodha.enet.dec.com ( Alan's Home for Wayward Notes File.) Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec,comp.unix.ultrix Subject: Re: Backup media choice Summary: Look carefully at software support. Keywords: backup Message-ID: <3216@shodha.enet.dec.com> Date: 24 May 91 00:34:59 GMT References: <1991May23.194357.14283@mlb.semi.harris.com> Followup-To: comp.sys.dec Organization: Digital Equipment Corp. - Colorado Springs, CO. Lines: 39 In article <1991May23.194357.14283@mlb.semi.harris.com>, jdr@sloth.mlb.semi.harris.com (Jim Ray) writes: > We are getting ready to choose a backup jukebox type system for our > existing DEC 5500's ( but additionally want to use it for our other machine ^^^^^^^^^^ This being a DECsystem 5500 will be significant later... > > What experiences have people had with dec's new solution? ( Apparently > some sort of TK70 like stacker that handles 2.3 gig per tape and a > transfer rate of 800k bytes/sec ). The tape system you refer is the TF857. The "TF" part means it's a DSSI tape drive. I suspect the "7" part has something to do with the loader. It uses a cartridge which on the outside looks a lot like a CompacTape I and II (TK50 and TK70). I suspect the media inside is a bit better than either. It looks like a good tape system. That said; ULTRIX doesn't support it. It would be an expensive exercise on your part to find out if lack of support means it's untested or doesn't work. Perhaps if there's a demand for it we'll make a SCSI version someday. Let you're sale representives know. > > Thanks, in advance.... You're welcome. > > -- > Jim Ray Harris Semiconductor > Internet: jdr@semi.harris.com PO Box 883 MS 62B-022 > Phone: (407) 729-5059 Melbourne, FL 32901 -- Alan Rollow alan@nabeth.cxn.dec.com