Path: utzoo!telecom-request
Date: 28 May 91 03:33:06 GMT
From: Dave Levenson <dave@westmark.westmark.com>
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Some Comments on History of AIOD
Message-ID: <telecom11.404.10@eecs.nwu.edu>
Organization: Westmark, Inc., Warren, NJ, USA
Sender: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 11, Issue 404, Message 10 of 10
Lines: 20

In article <telecom11.391.1@eecs.nwu.edu>, kitty!larry@uunet.uu.net
(Larry Lippman) writes:

> I don't believe there was ever any non-WECo apparatus that provided 
> an AIOD interface.

When I was in the interconnect business, selling Mitel SX-200 PBX
equipment, I used to notice references to AIOD in the documentation
for that product.  We never used the feature, or equipped a customer's
system to use it, so I have no first-hand experience with it, but the
SX-200 PBX, apparently, was AIOD-capable.  Anybody at Mitel care to
comment on this?


Dave Levenson		Internet: dave@westmark.com
Westmark, Inc.		UUCP: {uunet | rutgers | att}!westmark!dave
Warren, NJ, USA		AT&T Mail: !westmark!dave
Voice: 908 647 0900     Fax: 908 647 6857