Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!psuvax1!rutgers!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: time(0L) - history of a misconception
Message-ID: <16295@smoke.brl.mil>
Date: 29 May 91 07:52:03 GMT
References: <1991May25.221530.16119@zoo.toronto.edu> <1991May28.175246.2160@holos0.uucp> <1991May29.002529.22232@kithrup.COM>
Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD.
Lines: 4

In article <1991May29.002529.22232@kithrup.COM> sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan) writes:
>That is, the first element is set to 0.

*All* the members of the struct will receive zero or null initializers.