Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!parc!gregor
From: gregor@parc.xerox.com (Gregor Kiczales)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.clos
Subject: Re: PCL on KCL problems
Message-ID: <GREGOR.91May29123627@tracer-bullet.parc.xerox.com>
Date: 29 May 91 16:36:27 GMT
References: <1991May24.131534.12112@kub.nl> <4816@skye.ed.ac.uk>
Sender: news@parc.xerox.com
Organization: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center
Lines: 11
In-Reply-To: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk's message of 27 May 91 18:24:16 GMT

In article <4816@skye.ed.ac.uk> jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton) writes:

   From: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton)
   Newsgroups: comp.lang.clos
   Date: 27 May 91 18:24:16 GMT

   BTW, what happened to the test file that came with older versions
   of PCL?

It was redundant.  Because PCL is "written in itself" the very act of
loading it was a pretty good test suite.