Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!ukc!cam-cl!news
From: cet1@cl.cam.ac.uk (C.E. Thompson)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Re: Postscript Versions
Message-ID: <1991May29.140843.17807@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Date: 29 May 91 14:08:43 GMT
References: <1991May28.192950.17017@cadreor.uucp> <609@appserv.Eng.Sun.COM>
Reply-To: cet1@cl.cam.ac.uk (C.E. Thompson)
Organization: U of Cambridge Comp Lab, UK
Lines: 17

In article <609@appserv.Eng.Sun.COM> henry@angel.Eng.Sun.COM (Henry McGilton) writes:
>                                                       So a PostScript
>file starting with the line
>	PS-ADOBE-2.0
>
>claims to be conformant with version 2.0 of the Document
>Structuring Conventions.  Whether it actually is compliant,
>is of course, a completely different issue.

To nit-pick: such a document would not be conformant, and it is arguable
that it doesn't even claim to be. A conforming document would start
with "%!PS-Adobe-2.0" (possibly followed by other keywords). Case is
significant.

Chris Thompson
JANET:    cet1@uk.ac.cam.phx
Internet: cet1%phx.cam.ac.uk@nsfnet-relay.ac.uk