Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!att!drutx!druhi!seb1
From: seb1@druhi.ATT.COM (Sharon Badian)
Newsgroups: comp.software-eng
Subject: Re: Pictorial Case Tools
Message-ID: <8839@drutx.ATT.COM>
Date: 29 May 91 14:04:49 GMT
References: <1991May28.165251.4840@porthos.cc.bellcore.com>
Sender: news@drutx.ATT.COM
Lines: 14

in article <1991May28.165251.4840@porthos.cc.bellcore.com>, haim@taichi.uucp (24122-Haim Kilov(L028)m000) says:

> The question becomes, "Do bubbles and arcs express some relevant aspect
> of the system being designed in a convenient and precise language?" "
> 
> -- the most important question seems to be: "do bubbles and arcs represent
> a _precise_ language?"

How about "Do bubbles and arcs represent a *more precise* language than
what you are using currently?" If you are using plain old English, then
the answer is yes.

Sharon Badian
att!druhi!seb1