Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!mintaka!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!sics.se!fuug!news.funet.fi!hydra!klaava!wirzeniu
From: wirzeniu@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Lars Wirzenius)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: Help define Environment: usage in c.s.m
Message-ID: <1991May29.203238.21594@klaava.Helsinki.FI>
Date: 29 May 91 20:32:38 GMT
References: <1991May26.041741.22210@sparky.IMD.Sterling.COM>
Organization: University of Helsinki
Lines: 13

In article <1991May26.041741.22210@sparky.IMD.Sterling.COM> kent@sparky.IMD.Sterling.COM (Kent Landfield) writes:
>    Environment: syntax
>        Environment: Keyword [, keyword ..]

I think that some version information should be included in cases where
it matters.  SVR3 vs SVR4, X11R3 vs X11R3 and MS-DOS3.0 vs MS-DOS4.0 are
some examples. This could be done with version specific keywords, but I
think this is a bad idea. Instead, the syntax for keywords might be
extended with an optional '=version' part, for example MS-DOS=4.0,
SYSV=R3, X=R3, BSD=4.3-tahoe.

-- 
Lars Wirzenius     wirzeniu@cc.helsinki.fi