Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!bridge2!jarthur!uunet!mcsun!ukc!mucs!p4.cs.man.ac.uk!gilbertd From: gilbertd@p4.cs.man.ac.uk (Dave Gilbert) Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn Subject: Re: ARM3 spec changes Message-ID: Date: 29 May 91 07:36:54 GMT References: <1991May28.160336.11750@vaxa.strath.ac.uk> Sender: news@cs.man.ac.uk Lines: 16 In <1991May28.160336.11750@vaxa.strath.ac.uk> cabr07@vaxa.strath.ac.uk writes: >A report in the *April* issue of RISC User made reference to a new reduced >spec for ARM3s. In this months Risc User I seem to remember a little note from ARM or VLSI or one of the associated people syaing that although they had down spec'ed it they had given guarantees on its suitability for present Arm machines. (I think). Dave -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Dave Gilbert - gilbertd@p4.cs.man.ac.uk - The MTBF of a piece of equipment - - G7FHJ@GB7NWP - is inversly proportional to its - ------------------------------------------- importance -