Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!spool.mu.edu!uunet!tellab5!chinet!saj
From: saj@chinet.chi.il.us (Stephen Jacobs)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: What's a fair comparison?
Summary: proposed standards for speed and price
Keywords: Atari Motorola Intel GNU C ZEOS benchmark
Message-ID: <1991May30.145023.1684@chinet.chi.il.us>
Date: 30 May 91 14:50:23 GMT
Article-I.D.: chinet.1991May30.145023.1684
Organization: Chinet - Chicago Public Access UNIX
Lines: 19

I seem to be involved in what is fast becoming a shouting match about relative
price and performance of Atari computers vs those based on Intel chips.  One
of the main problems is knowing what to compare with which.  So how about we
pick some fair yardsticks.  Atari isn't 'Joes Garage Computer Manufactorie',
and shouldn't have prices compared with it.  I'll suggest ZEOS as a company
whose prices are widely advertized, and whose quality is comparable to Atari
(I rate both of them very good for service, by the way.  Start your own thread
if you want to talk about service).  Often as not, ZEOS machines are the least
expensive ones included in those comparative reviews magazines have so much
fun with.  Cross-platform benchmarks are damn near impossible (Byte magazine
has had several articles on the subject), but I'll modestly propose as a 
benchmark the time for GNU C to compile itself, with all temporary files on
hard disk.  Any other suggestions?

Ok now: I personally have none of these things: GNU C source distribution, 
TT or 80486 box.  The people I know who have them I trouble enough over more
serious issues.  Anyone care to post about how long it takes GNU C to 
compile itself on the TT?
                                       Steve      saj@chinet.chi.il.us