Xref: utzoo comp.sys.atari.st:38691 soc.culture.taiwan:11960 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!pacbell.com!ucsd!sdcc6!sdcc5!cs180sbg From: cs180sbg@sdcc5.ucsd.edu Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st,soc.culture.taiwan Subject: Re: Atari 540ST Questions Keywords: Atari Mice Good/Bad Message-ID: <19933@sdcc6.ucsd.edu> Date: 31 May 91 03:54:51 GMT References: <937m33w164w@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca> <426@equinox.unr.edu> Sender: news@sdcc6.ucsd.edu Followup-To: comp.sys.atari.st Organization: University of California, San Diego Lines: 24 In article <426@equinox.unr.edu> takem_b@mammoth.unr.edu (Brian Takemoto) writes: >>I wonder which Atari mouse you're talking about. All Atari mice I've >>used are the most dreadful rodents I've ever come across, second to >>none, not even the "original" VAXstation-100 mouse (ever seen one of >>these?) feels as bad. >I've seen good mice from Atari and still own (and swear by) my original >Atari mouse which is at least a couple years old and has been HEAVILY used >and abused by my brother playing Dungeon Master I and II. Keep in mind that >this mouse was made in Japan and not country XYZZY. I do swear by MY mouse, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ What country is this? >but I have also seen others that were "most dreadful rodents"... I've found >that the Japan mice keep good tracking, button touch, and feel with standard >care and cleaning... I cannot say the same for most others. > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >takem_b@mammoth.unr.edu (or ?) ucbvax.berkley.edu!mammoth.unr.edu!takem_b