Xref: utzoo comp.graphics:18306 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:9172
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!mintaka!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!fuug!news.funet.fi!hydra!klaava!cc.helsinki.fi!osmoviita
From: osmoviita@cc.helsinki.fi
Newsgroups: comp.graphics,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: BOCA/STB speed (speed of any card)
Message-ID: <1991May30.004228.1@cc.helsinki.fi>
Date: 29 May 91 22:42:28 GMT
References: <1991May28.232824.10754@marlin.jcu.edu.au>
Sender: news@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Uutis Ankka)
Organization: University of Helsinki
Lines: 23

In article <1991May28.232824.10754@marlin.jcu.edu.au>, eegeh@marlin.jcu.edu.au (Glen Elliot Harris) writes:
> 
>   Last week someone posted an artical stating that a BOCA SVGA card was
> faster than an STB clone, this clone being identical to the PowerGraph/
> EM16+.  The numbers were ~2300 for the STB and ~4500 for the BOCA.
> These were tested(I think) in a '386.
>   I have a Powergraph in my 16MHz '286 and it rates at 5400.  
> 
>   Something tells me that this 'clone' has maybe a few genetic
> defects....
> 
> Glen Harris 
> eegeh@wanda.jcu.edu.au
> 
> no .sig

Do you have normal 8 MHz bus speed? Rising processor or bus speed or both
in the same machine seems to give higher seed rates to these SVGAs.

It would be nice to tell in addition to configuration the bus speed when
speeds are measured.

Kari Osmoviita		osmoviita@cc.helsinki.fi