Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!crdgw1!ge-dab!tarpit!bilver!bill
From: bill@bilver.uucp (Bill Vermillion)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: 486SX - Intel now telling lies
Message-ID: <1991May30.024059.18023@bilver.uucp>
Date: 30 May 91 02:40:59 GMT
References: <1991May15.210339.17118@unlv.edu> <1561@aoa.UUCP> <1991May29.153843.27750@unlv.edu>
Organization: W. J. Vermillion - Winter Park, FL
Lines: 20

In article <1991May29.153843.27750@unlv.edu> whitney@reed.cs.unlv.edu (Lee Whitney) writes:
 
 
>When I posted the first article concerning Intel's claims on 486sx-20
>performance, I was only skeptical, but I just read the first
>486sx/486dx/386dx performance comparison's from an unbiased source (PC
>Magazine), and it does not do much to defend Intel's credibility.

(specs omitted - wjv)

Benchmarks in Byte magazine come up with the same conclusions.

Not often that these two magazines agree that closely.;


bill

-- 
Bill Vermillion - UUCP: ...!tarpit!bilver!bill
                      : bill@bilver.UUCP