Xref: utzoo comp.unix.sysv386:8466 comp.lang.c:39636
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!decwrl!deccrl!bloom-beacon!bloom-picayune.mit.edu!news
From: scs@adam.mit.edu (Steve Summit)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386,comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: time(0L) - history of a misconception (was Re: SCO password generator)
Summary: content-free meta-posting
Message-ID: <1991May25.003725.727@athena.mit.edu>
Date: 25 May 91 00:37:25 GMT
References: <381@tmcsys.UUCP> <1991May22.130713.25852@sco.COM> <1991May24.151350.22705@holos0.uucp>
Sender: news@athena.mit.edu (News system)
Reply-To: scs@adam.mit.edu
Followup-To: alt.religion.computers
Organization: Thermal Technologies, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 13

In article <1991May24.151350.22705@holos0.uucp> lbr@holos0.uucp (Len Reed) writes:
>Under what architecture is a NULL pointer not "all bits 0"?

Would it be at all possible for anyone who feels the urge to
contribute to this thread to read the comp.lang.c frequently-
asked questions list first, before posting anything more?  (If
you just joined us, this is a *very* old topic, at least for
comp.lang.c, and nothing new is being said.  If comp.unix.sysv386
finds this fascinating, please remove comp.lang.c from the
Newsgroups: line.)

                                            Steve Summit
                                            scs@adam.mit.edu